Commercial Profit

They consider them the fishing as ' ' payment extra' ' they use them to as value of exchange for other merchandises in land, or exactly used for consumption to the end of the day. Thus, the fish does not pass necessarily for market relations, but its function in the familiar supplying is fulfilled. In relation to this fact, it is had: ' ' a thing can be value of use, without being value of exchange. The case is this, when its utility for the man is not mediated by the work. (…) Who with its product satisfies its proper necessity creates value of use but not merchandise. (…) To become merchandise, it is necessary that the product is transferred to who goes to serve as value of use by means of troca.' ' (MARX, 1985).

Such particularitity of the fished one represents a differentiated form to supply the supplying demands. This condition of only value of use reflects the relations social which compose, still, the social subject messenger while who not yet is inserted total in the usual capitalist relations of production. The consisting fish of value of use and exchange, however, evidences an organization of the forces of work around a market structure which makes possible, in the capitalist form, the commercialization of this fished. In accordance with Abramovay (2008), ' ' markets must be studied under the institucional, sociological, historical angle, as constructions sociais' '. In this way, the restricted study to the economic conditions of market it is not enough for the full understanding of the dynamics of a social group with peculiar characteristics, as it is the social example of the group of fishing of the Mauazinho and its interactions. The capitalist market ' ' it is a form of social interaction that it distorts, it corrupts, polui, it degrades the nobility of the direct cooperation, not mediatizada for the money, between atores' ' (ABRAMOVAY, 2008).

It is likely that you’ve seen many ads and emails announcing that it is possible to make money filling out surveys online. The truth is that very few of them actually pay you to complete a survey. There are too many sites that charge you to be able to work with them so that you be paid for completing surveys. With the exception of very few, are all a fraud and the only thing they want is take away your money. You should not pay anyone to fill surveys, these people are just trying to steal your money.

Before you do anything you will need to investigate and analyze network site to find out if it is genuine or not. Because legitimate paid surveys sites need our services to complete their surveys has no need to charge us to work for them. Therefore it is important to be very careful with these sites. Sites that have paid surveys exist and do not charge a penny to start working for them. Registering with them is completely free. All you have to do is sign up for their Web site and they send you invitations to participate in their surveys. To receive the highest possible amount of invitations to participate in surveys will need to fill not only the general profile requested if not any another annex that is available on the Web site. These profile formats are very similar to the surveys and will focus on basic matters of home, employment, travel, holidays, finance etc.

It is important that you complete these surveys of profile to have greater opportunities for invitation to paid surveys. These invitations are made on the basis of preferences and trends only. Another advantage of making money filling out surveys online is that you should not take much time to complete them. A maximum of fifteen to thirty minutes will be enough to do it when you have a little free time.

They know of all its rights, but the obligations are unaware of and, when convoked to the fulfilment of the duties they allege its minority. But the episodes of violence in England ribombaram. Differently daqui, they intend there to punish the culprits. In reason of the necessity of exemplary penalizao of the criminals she was that, in the English parliament, prime minister David Cameron said that if a child has age to commit a crime, also has age to receive the punishment. With certainty the nose will have much people twisting, but we live in a society that lost the route. We supervalue the rights without giving the respective value to the duty, to the obligations. today in them we steal the application of penalties, when the minors transgress the norms.

English prime minister still made the following analysis: ‘ ‘ He has an enormous problem in our society with the children growing without knowing the difference between certain wrong e. It is not poverty question, is culture question. A culture that the violence glorifies, that shows disrespect to the authority and that it says everything on rights, but nothing on deveres’ ‘. Evidently it is speaking from England and for the English, but if we will have courage we can apply what it said what our society walks preparing. Not only they, but we also live in a society that if esbalda speaking of rights, without the requirement of the fulfilment of duties.

At the same time of the riots in England and the challenge of premier, gangs of the girls had gained manchetes, in Brazil. E, in the same way that there, here some promoters, appeals court judges and jurists if had revealed on the necessity of if reformulating the ECA. Or, the least, to remake the interpretation of the law, keeping the rights of the minors, but without this hinders the punishment application on the infractors, thing that today does not occur. That is, at least some people moved for good sense already they are perceiving that we are arriving at the deep one of the well. We must notice that it has an enormous difference between respecting the minor, enhancing its rights and tolerating impunity. A right is not overlapped to the duty nor exempts of the guilt and the necessary punishment. If what it is charged is the love stops with the minor, let us remember to us that for times punishment also it can represent a love gesture the fact is that nor always the laws are protecting the citizen. Many times occur supervaluing of the rights of the infractor, the delinquent, of the outlaw, against the citizen. Perceiving itself abandoned for the law, it does not go to delay so that the citizen demands the right to the self-defense and starts to make justice with the proper hands. In the crossroads where if it finds society two ways are possible: to rescue the values and the rights of the citizen or directing in them, definitively, for the barbarity.